| Payload Capacity | The chassis must safely carry the robot body, battery, sensors, controller, and the intended load without excessive frame deflection or loss of traction. | Compare the rated payload with the actual gross weight of the vehicle. Include a safety margin of at least 20% Check whether the rating applies during static operation, driving, turning, or ramp climbing. | Load test report, structural calculation, axle-load data, and a demonstration under the buyer's real load distribution. | 15% |
| Dimensions and Mechanical Compatibility | Incorrect mounting dimensions can create redesign costs, installation delays, and unstable weight distribution. | Compare overall length, width, height, wheelbase, mounting-hole pattern, center of gravity, ground clearance, and turning envelope. Tolerance: verify on approved engineering drawings | 2D drawings, 3D CAD files, mounting interface specifications, and a sample-fit inspection. | 10% |
| Drive and Steering Performance | Motor torque, wheel configuration, and steering architecture determine acceleration, maneuverability, traction, and performance on uneven floors. | Compare rated speed, acceleration, turning radius, maximum grade, wheel material, drive-wheel quantity, and skid-steer or differential-drive behavior. Test with the target payload | Performance curves, grade-climbing test, turning test, floor-condition test, and motor-controller specifications. | 15% |
| Navigation and Control Compatibility | The chassis must communicate reliably with the buyer's navigation system, fleet manager, PLC, sensors, and upper-level software. | Check support for CAN bus, Ethernet, RS-232/RS-485, digital I/O, API or SDK access, encoder feedback, emergency-stop signals, and control-mode options. Require an interface control document | Communication protocol, API documentation, sample code, wiring diagram, integration checklist, and live interoperability test. | 15% |
| Battery System and Operating Time | Battery voltage, capacity, charging method, and thermal protection directly affect operating hours, downtime, and vehicle size. | Compare battery chemistry, nominal voltage, ampere-hour capacity, continuous current, charging time, automatic charging compatibility, battery-swap design, and estimated runtime under actual duty cycles. Runtime should be validated under real payload and floor conditions | Battery datasheet, battery-management-system specifications, runtime test, charger certification, and cycle-life information. | 12% |
| Safety and Protection Functions | Safety functions reduce the risk of collision, uncontrolled movement, electrical hazards, and damage to people or equipment. | Check emergency stop, protective bumpers, obstacle-sensor interfaces, speed reduction zones, audible and visual alarms, braking behavior, overload protection, and restart logic. Assess against the applicable local safety requirements | Risk assessment, safety circuit diagram, stop-distance test, functional-safety documentation, and applicable conformity declarations. | 15% |
| Floor Adaptability and Environmental Rating | AGV chassis performance can change substantially with floor joints, dust, moisture, temperature, slopes, and surface friction. | Compare minimum floor clearance, allowable floor gaps, slope capability, operating temperature, humidity range, wheel-floor friction, and enclosure rating such as IP54 or higher where required. Match the rating to the actual facility | Environmental test results, IP test report when applicable, wheel specification, floor-condition trial, and operating-limit statement. | 8% |
| Manufacturing Quality and Consistency | Stable production processes help ensure that engineering samples, pilot units, and mass-produced chassis have consistent performance. | Compare incoming inspection, assembly traceability, calibration procedures, end-of-line testing, supplier controls, and defect-handling processes. A documented quality system is preferable | Quality manual, inspection plan, sample test records, process-control documents, nonconformance procedure, and factory audit results. | 8% |
| Customization and Engineering Support | AGV projects often require changes to mounting plates, wiring, software interfaces, battery layout, sensors, or load-handling structures. | Evaluate design capability, engineering response time, prototype process, drawing-control procedure, change-management method, and ability to support low-volume customization. Define customization limits before quotation | Engineering team profile, sample drawings, prototype schedule, change-request workflow, and a written scope of supply. | 7% |
| Testing, Reliability, and Serviceability | Reliability and easy maintenance influence total ownership cost and the availability of the AGV fleet. | Compare endurance testing, motor and gearbox access, wheel replacement time, cable protection, spare-parts availability, preventive-maintenance intervals, and mean-time-to-repair targets. Request data based on comparable applications | Endurance-test records, maintenance manual, spare-parts list, warranty terms, service response commitment, and failure-analysis process. | 8% |
| Lead Time, Delivery Terms, and Total Cost | The lowest purchase price may not represent the lowest project cost after integration, tooling, freight, spare parts, training, and downtime are included. | Compare prototype lead time, production lead time, minimum order quantity, tooling charges, packaging, shipping terms, taxes, spare-parts cost, warranty coverage, training, and integration labor. Use a total-cost-of-ownership calculation | Formal quotation, delivery schedule, warranty policy, payment terms, Incoterms, spare-parts price list, and project-cost breakdown. | 7% |